Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Surg Today ; 2022 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20241542

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To define the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on hospital surgical activity and assess the incidence of perioperative COVID-19 within two protocolized screening pathways for elective and non-elective surgery. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of adults undergoing surgery during the COVID-19 outbreak. The elective pathway included telephone surveys and a quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction test (RT-PCR) only for patients who were asymptomatic and at low risk of infection. Only patients with negative screening underwent surgery. In the non-elective pathway, preoperative screening was performed during the hospital admission. RESULTS: Among 835 patients considered for the elective pathway, 725 had negative RT-PCR results and underwent surgery. This reflects an 83% reduction in surgical activity from 2019. Moreover, 596 patients underwent non-elective surgery, representing a 28% reduction. Preoperatively, 39 patients (6.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and underwent surgery through the non-elective pathway, vs. none in the elective pathway (p < 0.001). Postoperatively, 1.4% of elective surgery patients and 2.2% of non-elective surgery patients tested positive (p > 0.05). Mortality was higher in non-elective surgery (0.6% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001) and in patients with COVID-19 (0% vs. 14%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The low incidence of COVID-19 in elective surgeries during the outbreak demonstrates the importance and effectiveness of preoperative screening, combining surveys and RT-PCR.

2.
Cir Esp ; 2021 Oct 25.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2244869

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The SARS-COV-2 pandemic has affected training opportunities for healthcare professionals partly because face to face courses were cancelled. This study analiyzes the results of participation and satisfaction of the AEC Virtual Classroom sessions during the first yearMethods: The AEC Virtual Classroom includes a combined format of weekly webinar broadcast live that can be viewed on a delayed basis in a virtual platform. In this study, the results in its first year are evaluated considering the number of live participants, the delayed views and the global reach; as well as the results of the satisfaction survey in each of the sessions (0-10)Results: From 16/04/2020 to 15/04/2021, 50 sessions of the Virtual Classroom AEC were held. The average scope of the sessions was 509±288 views with a range between 196 and 149. At the times of highest incidence of cases during the pandemic, a decrease in live participants was observed 275±135 vs 391±233 (p=0,032) The mean score on the format was 8,46± 0,31/10. The best-scored sessions were those of the subject related to coloproctology with a statistically significant difference in the mean score 8,79±0,42 vs 8,39±0,27 (p=0,035). 90% of users considered the sessions useful. 97,2% of respondents believe that the sessions should be maintained after the pandemic. CONCLUSION: The AEC virtual Classroom has had a very good results in the first year, proving to be a useful surgical teaching tool that will foreseeably survive once the pandemic is over.

5.
Cirugía Española (English Edition) ; 2021.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-1213085

ABSTRACT

Introduction The extraordinary impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Spanish hospitals has led to a redistribution of resources for the treatment of these patients, with a decreased capacity of care for other common diseases. The aim of the present study is to analyse how this situation has affected the treatment of cholecystitis and cholelythiasis. Methods It is a descriptive national study after online voluntary distribution of a specific questionnaire with Google Drive™ to members of the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC). Results We received 153 answers (one per hospital). Elective cholecystectomies have been cancelled in 96.7% of centres. Conservative treatment for acute cholecystitis has been selected in 90% (previously 18%), and if operated, 95% have been performed laparoscopically. Globally, only 49% perform preoperative diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2, and 58.5% recognize there have been cases confirmed postoperatively after other surgeries, with worse surgical outcomes in 54%. Conclusions This survey shows that most of the Spanish centers are following the surgical societies suggestions during the pandemic. However, some data requires to be taken into account for the next phase of the pandemic. Resumen Introducción La pandemia COVID-19 ha tenido una repercusión extraordinaria sobre los hospitales españoles, que han reorganizado sus recursos para tratar a estos pacientes, limitando su capacidad de atender otras patologías frecuentes. El presente estudio analiza la repercusión sobre el tratamiento de la colelitiasis y la colecistitis aguda. Métodos Se ha realizado un estudio nacional descriptivo mediante una encuesta online voluntaria, realizada en Google Drive™, distribuida por correo electrónico desde la Asociación Española de Cirujanos (AEC) a todos los cirujanos miembros. Resultados Se han recibido 153 encuestas (una por centro). El 96,7% de ellos han suspendido las colecistectomías electivas. El tratamiento conservador de la colecistitis aguda no complicada se ha realizado en un 90% de los casos (siendo previamente del 18%) y, en las colecistitis intervenidas, el 95% ha optado por el abordaje laparoscópico. Un 49% realiza algún test preoperatorio para SARS-CoV-2, y el 57% comunica haber tenido casos de confirmación postoperatoria tras alguna intervención, con peor evolución postoperatoria en el 54%. Conclusiones Esta encuesta revela que la mayoría de los centros están siguiendo las recomendaciones de las sociedades quirúrgicas durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Sin embargo, se observan algunos datos que precisan ser tenidos en cuenta en las fases sucesivas de la pandemia.

6.
Obes Surg ; 31(1): 451-456, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1064592

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to achieve consensus amongst a global panel of expert bariatric surgeons on various aspects of resuming Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery (BMS) during the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A modified Delphi consensus-building protocol was used to build consensus amongst 44 globally recognised bariatric surgeons. The experts were asked to either agree or disagree with 111 statements they collectively proposed over two separate rounds. An agreement amongst ≥ 70.0% of experts was construed as consensus as per the predetermined methodology. We present here 38 of our key recommendations. This first global consensus statement on the resumption of BMS can provide a framework for multidisciplinary BMS teams planning to resume local services as well as guide future research in this area.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , COVID-19 , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Humans , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Obes Surg ; 31(5): 2115-2124, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1042543

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Home lockdown and isolation due to COVID-19 have been related to negative changes in mood, sleep, and eating behaviors. People with obesity are especially vulnerable to emotional eating and might be more prone to weight gain and negative outcomes during lockdown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Individuals scheduled for an appointment at the Obesity Unit of a Tertiary Hospital between March 16 and June 21 (n=1230). An online survey was distributed on May 11. Multivariable logistic regression models and general linear models were used to assess the relationship between perceived COVID-19 threat, BS status, and outcome variables. RESULTS: Of the 603 (72.0% females, 39% aged >55 years) respondents, 223 (36.9%) were BS naïve (non-BS), 134 (22.2%) underwent BS within the two previous years (BS<2y), and 245 (40.6%) more than 2 years before (BS>2y). Participants worried about being infected by COVID-19 showed significantly larger changes in family contact (p=0.04), mood (p<0.01), sleep (p<0.01), dietary habits (p=0.05), purchases of unhealthy food (p=0.02), snacking (p=0.05), and physical activity (p=0.02). Non-BS and BS>2y participants reported greater impact of lockdown in mood (p<0.01), experienced more negative changes in dietary habits (p<0.01), and had a higher likelihood for weight gain (OR: 5.61, 95% CI: 3.0-10.46; OR: 5.45, 95% CI: 2.87-10.35, respectively) compared to BS<2y. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 pandemic is having a substantial negative impact in our population affected by obesity. During lockdown, people more than 2 years before BS behave like people without history of BS. Strategies addressed to prevent negative metabolic outcomes in this population are urgently needed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Obesity, Morbid , Aged , Communicable Disease Control , Feeding Behavior , Female , Humans , Life Style , Male , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain/epidemiology
8.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 98(8): 433-441, 2020 Oct.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-816350

ABSTRACT

New coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 infection (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) has determined the necessity of reorganization in many centers all over the world. Spain, as an epicenter of the disease, has been forced to assume health policy changes in all the territory. However, and from the beginning of the pandemic, every center attending surgical urgencies had to guarantee the continuous coverage adopting correct measures to maintain the excellence of quality of care. This document resumes general guidelines for emergency surgery and trauma care, obtained from the available bibliography and evaluated by a subgroup of professionals designated from the general group of investigators Cirugía-AEC-COVID-19 from the Spanish Association of Surgeons, directed to minimize professional exposure, to contemplate pandemic implications over different urgent perioperative scenarios and to adjust decision making to the occupational pressure caused by COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Infection Control/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Traumatology/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain
9.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 99(5): 346-353, 2021 May.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-746081

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The extraordinary impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Spanish hospitals has led to a redistribution of resources for the treatment of these patients, with a decreased capacity of care for other common diseases. The aim of the present study is to analyse how this situation has affected the treatment of cholecystitis and cholelythiasis. METHODS: It is a descriptive national study after online voluntary distribution of a specific questionnaire with Google Drive™ to members of the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC). RESULTS: We received 153 answers (one per hospital). Elective cholecystectomies have been cancelled in 96.7% of centres. Conservative treatment for acute cholecystitis has been selected in 90% (previously 18%), and if operated, 95% have been performed laparoscopically. Globally, only 49% perform preoperative diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2, and 58.5% recognize there have been cases confirmed postoperatively after other surgeries, with worse surgical outcomes in 54%. CONCLUSIONS: This survey shows that most of the Spanish centers are following the surgical societies suggestions during the pandemic. However, some data requires to be taken into account for the next phase of the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cholecystitis, Acute/therapy , Cholelithiasis/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Spain/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL